I owe my parents a lot. And I don't just mean four years of college and 18 years of room and board (plus an extra 9 months' rent, according to my mom). From my dad I inherited an engineering bent, entrepreneurial spirit, and a high sensitivity to acetaldehyde and methoxy-pyrazines. From my mom I inherited musical sense and a love of numbers, metrics, data, whatever you want to call it - I'm a statistics junkie.
When it comes to wine statistics, CellarTracker is a gold mine. There's a huge amount of data (69,000 users as of 2008), and behind CT's butt-ugly interface hides an excellent tasting note organization system which I have personally taken advantage of ... 430 times to date. After about 15 months of wine tasting, I decided to satisfy my statistical curiosity.
Before I get into the numbers, I should acknowledge that CT scores suffer from several sources of noise, including but not limited to:
- Palate variance: experience levels, genetic perception thresholds
- Bottle variance: change over time, bottle flaws (not always recognized by tasters), other bottle variation
- Conditions: temperature, glassware, accompanying food, ambient aromas
- Scoring systems: A 90 point score means different things to different people
- Wines are scored without regard to price. In other words, if I perceive a $4 wine to be of equal quality as a $100 wine, I will give them identical scores.
- I do not score wines that are flawed, or that I believe have low levels of acetaldehyde (from oxidation).
- I score wines on a 50-100 point scale based on intellectual and emotional reactions:
- 50-60 points: "I cannot drink this without gagging. I want to kill the winemaker."
- 60-70 points: "You'd have to pay me to drink it, but I probably wouldn't vomit."
- 70-80 points: "Not horrible, but has several pretty glaring flaws."
- 80-85 points: "I'd drink it, but it's not exciting."
- 85-90 points: "Pretty good, interesting."
- 90-95 points: "Holy crap, that is really friggen good and fascinating to drink!"
- 95-100 points: "The ground is shaking, the clouds are singing!"

Next I looked at the geographical spread of my tasting notes. Because of wine's intimate connection with terroir and culture, I love to imagine that each bottle takes me on a brief trip to its birthplace. Walking through a wine store is like browsing a global travel catalogue. When it comes to countries, France and the US dominate. The only reason Italy follows is because I tasted over 60 Italian wines in just a few hours at a trade tasting last September.
.png)
Looking closer at the region level, it appears that California dominates. However this is largely a side effect of my job last summer working in various vineyards. Most of my tasting has centered around various French regions, resulting in a rather crowded "Other" category.
.png)

Finally I looked up my top 5 wines so far. They represent three different countries and all come from different appellations. Each one was a surprise and a revelation - a profound learning experience:
1. Sean Thackrey "Pleiades" XV old vines (Bolinas, CA) - A wonderfully complex, delicious blend from a visionary winemaker (95 points)
2. '96 Taluau Vieilles Vignes (St.-Nicholas de Bourgueil) - A stunning wine from left field - aged cabernet france, in all its stewed bell pepper and cassis glory (95 points)
3. '00 Guigal Cote-Rotie "La Mouline" - Aged over 30 months in new oak, yet its delicate body doesn't show it. Tiramisu, blackberry, and bacon (94 points)
4. '05 Melis (Priorat, Spain) - Pure fruit wrapped in astounding layers of oak treatment, producing caramel, roasted nuts, and coffee (93 points)
5. '98 Chateau Kirwan (Margaux) - My first aged Bordeaux - not something I'll likely forget anytime soon (93 points)
2 comments:
As a biomedical engineer...I loved this post.
Keep it up.
Craig
Thanks for reading, Craig!
Post a Comment